Talliki Vandanam Windfall: ₹13,000 x 12 Kids = ₹1.56 Lakh – AP Welfare Under Scrutiny
Welfare or fiscal folly?
While hailed as a progressive move, this loophole reveals a glaring financial vulnerability:
Massive strain on public coffers: With over 67 lakh children enrolled, the state has earmarked between ₹8,745 crore (first phase) to ₹9,407 crore for the coming year. Critics argue that such humongous spending—on unlimited per-child payments—may bleed essential funds for roads, healthcare, irrigation, and education infrastructure.
“If 10,300 crore used for school-infra across 61,514 schools, each school gets ₹16 lakh”.
Demographic distortion: more children encouraged
A worrying subtext: families with more children—statistically more common among minority communities—gain disproportionately. Already, state politicians have actively promoted incentives for having a third child, including ₹50,000 cash and even a cow. This stands to:
- Encourage higher birth rates in specific demographics.
- Shift the demographic balance over future generations.
- Undermine previous efforts to stabilize population growth.
Experts suggest the real motive may also be political—offsetting potential loss in parliamentary seats due to delimitation.
A ticking financial time bomb
Andhra Pradesh is no stranger to fiscal strain. The state’s debt has ballooned to nearly ₹9.74 lakh crore, with budget deficits around ₹1.46 lakh crore for 2024–25.
These figures cast doubt on the sustainability of giant welfare outlays when developmental priorities—like building infrastructure, boosting education quality, and improving health services—remain severely underfunded.
The urgent recalibration the state needs
1. Capping benefits per family: Reinstating the two-child limit—used in previous welfare policies—could prevent exploitation and preserve fairness.
2. Targeted welfare: Shifting from universal payouts to means-tested support ensures that funds reach genuinely underserved children.
4. Monitoring demographic trends: Policies must avoid unintentionally incentivizing asymmetric population growth across communities.
